National unified large-scale governance overload operation. Let more and more transporters see the fact that the “large-tonnage small-scale†car has now “no way to goâ€, in order to achieve a better return on profits. Buying a truly large tonnage model is the only choice. The “big ton small standard†has changed its face and saw the “super cure†policy more and more firm. Do not see signs of loosening, has been the "cat" on the side of the transport operator Lao Zhang, recently really could not hold back, ready to buy a new car. However, in the search for a new car, he was surprised to find that only a few months later, the market has not only emerged many new models. In addition, the nominal load of these models, compared with the previous models of the brand, has been substantially "buy". Dealer told him: This is called "small tons of large standard" car, sold special fire! National Development and Reform Commission released the vehicle announcement. The reporter also found that in recent months, some manufacturers have launched a large number of new cars, many of which are large tonnage models. An industry source who has been studying the truck market for a long time told reporters that this change was a direct result of two incidents: First, the recent unprecedented stringent oversight of governance has lasted for a long time, only beginning and not ending. In order to determine the overload limit. The Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of Communications also issued uniform standards: In February and June, the National Development and Reform Commission requested the company to restore the original appearance of the “large-tonnage†vehicle and accurately calibrate the vehicle's load. Is it not necessary to control overloading and restore the normal standard of “large-ton small-scale†vehicles? How come there is a “small-ton standard?†Is this an overkill practice? To answer this question, we must also overcome the problem of overloading. Speaking of standards. In order to unify the coordination of national oversight action, in early April this year, the Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of Communications issued the “Notification on Unified Control of Over-Currently Overloaded Vehicle Identification Standards to Avoid Repeated Penalties and Related Issuesâ€, which stipulates: two-axle vehicle bodywork and The total weight of goods exceeds 20. Ton. The gross weight of goods in three-axle vehicles exceeds 30 tons, the gross weight of goods in four-axle vehicles exceeds 40 tons, the total weight of goods in five-axle vehicles exceeds 50 tons, and the total weight of vehicles with six or more axles exceeds 55 tons. situation,. Should be identified as overloaded vehicles and corrected. The new policy of “speculative vehicles†has been introduced to the policies and regulations. In the past, the “large-tonnage-small-scale†plus overloaded transport model has become impracticable. In the case of no overloading, in strict accordance with the loading of freight, the larger the carrying capacity of a car on a single trip. The lower the transporter's cost, the more profitable it is. Therefore, large-tonnage vehicles are becoming more and more popular in the market. Inspired by the "Notice", some manufacturers sprouted inspiration and reacted quickly to a "small tonnage". “Some new models have entered the seat in the recognition standards, according to the standard load limit, then remove the weight of the vehicle, get the current load value. This is the standard under the standard, this type of vehicle can limit the nominal load.†An industry The technicians broke this "window paper". Some people may ask, these new models may not all be "small tons of big mark", some car weight may not exceed the design capabilities of the vehicle. indeed so. But there are two situations. One is to restore normal tonnage and restore the previously marked load to the true vehicle load. To be precise, this type of vehicle cannot be called a “small tonnage†vehicle. In another case, the "small-ton large-scale" car is the real "small-ton large-scale" car. The total weight of goods it weighed exceeds the standard for “Outline size, axle load and quality limit of road vehicles†that will be implemented on October 1 this year. Now, before October 1, it It is the implementation of these now legitimate "small tonnage" vehicles. It becomes a super car. Therefore, the “small tonnage†car is actually a “speculative car†that traverses between policy time differences. Moreover, its vitality is so short that it can be described in a flash. In the soon-to-be-implemented standards, the limit value of the maximum quality of cargoes is lower than the standards issued by the Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of Communications, and there are differences in different models. For example, the maximum allowable total mass of a 3-axle truck is 25 tons, and the maximum total mass of a 6-axle truck train is only 49 tons, which is lower than the standard in the “Noticeâ€. The irrational "abnormal child" In this case, why manufacturers do not directly according to the new standards to be implemented to the new car calibration load? "No way, who are not willing to give up the immediate interests, if the initiative to lower some, then the implementation of new standards It is difficult to guarantee sales performance in the first few months. Competitors are so marked that we cannot wait for it.†The people involved in heavy-duty truck makers are helpless. In order to compete for the immediate market, the "Little Tonnage" competition currently being held has become a "bright landscape" in the commercial vehicle market. This short-lived car is like a stimulant, supporting the real prosperity of the heavy truck market. As for what kind of trouble and loss this kind of short-lived vehicle will bring to users in the future, manufacturers have no time for consideration. Transporter Lao Wang said: "There is such a standard? Our people do not know so much. When buying a car, it is only appropriate to feel that it is appropriate. If you really want to buy a car and it is not a standard, we will lose money. Manufacturers are too Irresponsible.†For the enterprise, it is a long-term business. Only the sales volume and market share are large, and there are sequelae that can be solved later. In spite of the implementation of the new standards, these "small tonnage" vehicles have to be renewed on the "announcement" and the cost of change is quite expensive. However, companies can't care for the time being. And these costs will eventually be paid by consumers. The direct reason for the “large-tonnage small-scale†is that the manufacturers cater to the user’s mentality of minimizing road maintenance fees and tolls. The nominal load capacity of the vehicle is reduced, and the user can escape part of the vehicle cost. In the current nationwide unified oversight and overloading operation, the owner of the “large-ton small-scale†vehicle is the one with the greatest loss. The heavy tonnage heavy trucks in accordance with the actual standard weight became the beneficiaries of Zhi Chao. just now. Manufacturers have created such a "small tonnage" car. Before it can make such a decision, it should carefully reflect on the previous lessons. Policies and regulations must create a fair market environment. This is what automotive companies are eager to see. However, if a company is to be a qualified corporate citizen, it is not a precondition to violate the law. It should also conscientiously defend the law instead of drilling for the law and doing harm to the interests of consumers. Competition should be a high level of competition, not a trick to play tricks.
Waterjet
Data Industry Co.,Ltd , https://www.whdatacn.com